There was a man who stood in the Lagos night, saxophone pressed to his lips, sweat running down his face like the tears of a continent, and he was saying something that every Nigerian knew and still knows in their bones but has not yet found the courage to say out loud. He is not whispering it. He is not filing it in a petition or debating it in a chamber. He is blowing it through brass and rhythm and the irresistible, undeniable language of music, into the thick humid air of the Shrine, where ordinary people market women, bus drivers, students, the forgotten and the furious are nodding their heads because every note he plays is a sentence from their own unwritten autobiography.
Soldier go, soldier come.
Fela Anikulapo-Kuti did not merely write a song. He wrote a diagnosis. He performed an autopsy on a living nation and held up the findings for everyone to see and what he found, buried beneath the uniforms and the decrees and the propaganda of successive military governments, was not order, not discipline, not the salvation that every coup promised at gunpoint. What he found was a pattern. A cycle so deeply entrenched, so shamelessly repeated, that it had begun to masquerade as the natural condition of African governance. As though the boot on the neck was not an imposition but a feature. As though the Nigerian people had been born to be governed by men who took power not through the ballot but through the barrel, and who confused the silence of the terrorized with the consent of the governed.
To understand what Fela was saying, you must first understand what Nigeria had already lived through by the time his voice rose against it. Independence came in 1960 with the fanfare and the flags and the intoxicating promise of self-determination. For six years, Nigeria governed itself through its imperfect, complicated, but fundamentally legitimate civilian structures. Then January 1966 arrived, and with it the first coup soldiers deciding, with the unilateral arrogance that would become the defining posture of Nigerian military culture, that they knew better than the electorate. General Aguiyi-Ironsi took power. Six months later, another coup. Yakubu Gowon. Then civil war. Then Murtala Muhammed in 1975. Then Olusegun Obasanjo. Then a return to civilian rule in 1979 under Shehu Shagari a brief, gasping window of democratic air before Muhammadu Buhari slammed it shut again in December 1983, the same year Fela released this song, as though history were collaborating with the music to make the point undeniable.
Soldier go. Soldier come. The faces changed. The boots did not.
What Fela understood, with the clarity of a man who had been beaten by those boots, whose mother had been murdered by those boots, whose home had been burned to ash by those boots, was that the rotation of military governments was not a series of unrelated events. It was a system. A self-perpetuating machinery of control in which the uniform was simply the costume worn by power as it recycled itself through different hands while the suffering of the ordinary Nigerian remained the one constant. The names on the radio changed. The decrees were renumbered. The promises of discipline and accountability were reissued with the fresh confidence of men who had apparently not noticed that their predecessors had made identical promises and delivered identical failures. But underneath all the rotation, the fundamental relationship between the Nigerian state and the Nigerian citizen remained unchanged: the state had the gun, and the citizen had the consequences.
But Fela was not merely indicting the military as an institution. He was pointing at something more insidious, more deeply rooted, more difficult to uproot than any individual general or any particular coup. He was pointing at the culture of militarism that had infected Nigerian political life so completely that it persisted even when the soldiers were technically not in power. The military did not only govern Nigeria when it formally governed Nigeria. It governed Nigeria in the way it shaped the psychology of authority, the expectation of violence as governance, the normalization of the idea that power is something seized rather than earned, exercised rather than trusted, protected with force rather than justified through service.
When civilian governments operated in Nigeria, they often operated with the borrowed grammar of military rule. The big man at the top. The unquestioned directive. The loyalist structure that rewarded silence and punished dissent. The deployment of security forces not to protect citizens but to protect the powerful from citizens. The militarization of ordinary political disagreement. Nigeria did not need soldiers in uniform to be governed militaristically. The military had so thoroughly colonized the imagination of Nigerian power that its spirit remained even when its physical presence was temporarily withdrawn.
This is the subtlety that Fela was excavating beneath the more obvious critique. He was not simply saying that coups were bad. He was saying that the entire architecture of Nigerian authority had been constructed on a foundation of force, and that until that foundation was demolished and replaced with something genuinely accountable, genuinely rooted in the will and welfare of the people, the rotation would continue. Soldier go, soldier come because the system that produced soldiers as governors had not been dismantled. It had merely changed its jacket.
And then there is the question of legality. Of constitutional legitimacy. Of the fundamental, irreducible illegality of every military government that ever pressed its boot into the soil of an independent African nation.
This is something that Nigerian political discourse has historically been reluctant to confront with full honesty, partly because so many of Nigeria's institutions, boundaries, policies, and power structures were shaped by military governments whose decisions were subsequently absorbed into the body of the state as though they had been democratically arrived at. But the truth, stated plainly, is this: no military government in Nigerian history had any legal right to exist. Not one. Not the ones that came with genuine reformist intentions. Not the ones that quickly descended into kleptocracy. Not the ones that were brief and the ones that were long. Every single one of them was, from the moment of its inception, a criminal enterprise against the Nigerian constitution and against the Nigerian people.
A constitution is not merely a document. It is a covenant. It is the formal, written expression of the agreement between a people and the state they have chosen to create the terms under which power is granted, exercised, limited, and transferred. When a group of armed men suspend that constitution at gunpoint, they are not restoring order. They are committing the most fundamental disorder possible in a governed society. They are saying, with their rifles and their broadcast announcements and their decrees, that the agreement does not matter. That the consent of the governed is a convenience to be honored when convenient and discarded when inconvenient. That sovereignty, which belongs to the people, can be confiscated by whoever has enough ammunition to take it.
Fela understood this not as a legal abstraction but as a lived outrage. He had watched the Nigerian military not only suspend constitutions but suspend humanity. He had seen what happened to those who resisted the detentions without trial, the beatings in barracks, the disappeared voices, the broken bodies returned to families without explanation or apology. He had experienced it personally, intimately, in the burning of Kalakuta, in the death of his mother Funmilayo, in the countless arrests that the state used to try to silence the saxophone that kept telling the truth.
They could not silence it. And that, in itself, was a political statement. That Fela kept playing, kept recording, kept walking back onto the stage after every arrest and every beating and every loss that was not merely artistic stubbornness. That was a man enacting, in his own body and his own life, the very argument of the song. You came. You did your worst. I am still here. Soldier go, soldier come. The people remain.
There is a line in the architecture of Fela's Afrobeat that mirrors his political philosophy perfectly. The music does not resolve in the conventional Western sense. It does not build to a climax and release and conclude. It circles. It repeats. The same phrase comes back, again and again, slightly varied, relentlessly persistent like truth that refuses to be forgotten, like a people that refuses to be permanently defeated, like a pattern of oppression that keeps returning because the root has not been addressed. When you listen to Soldier Go, Soldier Come and feel that hypnotic, circular groove, you are feeling Fela's argument in your body before your mind has fully processed it. This is the cycle, the music says. This is what it feels like to live inside a repetition that has no natural end. And this is also what resistance feels like not a single dramatic break, but the sustained, rhythmic, undefeated insistence on remaining.
The song was released in 1983. In December of that year, General Muhammadu Buhari overthrew Shehu Shagari's civilian government. The song had barely finished playing before history confirmed its thesis with the punctuality of a system that had no shame and no self-awareness. Soldier come. Again. As though the music had been prophetic rather than observational. As though Nigeria's military class had listened to Fela's diagnosis and, rather than feel indicted, had simply nodded and proceeded.
What does it do to a people, to live for decades under this particular uncertainty? To know that the government above you rests not on your consent but on the tolerance of men with weapons? To understand, at the cellular level of civic life, that the rules can change overnight, that the constitution is a document that can be suspended by breakfast and replaced by decree before lunch, that your rights are not inherent but are permitted permitted today, potentially revoked tomorrow, depending on the mood and the ambition of whoever controls the armory?
It does something specific and damaging to the relationship between a citizen and their state. It teaches disengagement. It cultivates a profound, rational cynicism about governance as a project. Why invest belief in institutions that can be dismantled at gunpoint? Why build civic identity around a constitutional order that has been suspended more times than it has been honored? Why teach your children that the law is supreme when both you and your children have watched, repeatedly, men with guns demonstrate that the law is only supreme until it isn't?
This is the deepest damage of Nigeria's military cycles not the specific policies of specific governments, not even the corruption and the looting, catastrophic as those were but the erosion of civic faith. The slow, methodical destruction of the Nigerian citizen's belief that their participation in governance means anything at all. That their vote, their voice, their engagement with democratic processes is anything other than a performance staged for the benefit of whoever currently holds power.
Fela saw this. He named it. He named it loudly, repeatedly, over Afrobeat rhythms that made the naming irresistible and unforgettable. He named it at great personal cost the cost of his freedom, his safety, his mother's life. And he named it not with the despair of someone who had given up on his people, but with the burning, furious love of someone who believed that Nigerians deserved better than what they were being given. That Africa deserved better than the cycle of uniformed men and broken promises and suspended constitutions and civilian suffering.
The soldiers have mostly gone now, in the formal sense. Nigeria has maintained civilian democratic governance since 1999 the longest unbroken stretch in its post-independence history. This is not nothing. It is, in fact, significant. But the ghost of military governance still moves through the corridors of Nigerian power with an ease that suggests it never fully left. It moves in the impunity of the powerful. In the deployment of security forces against citizens exercising legitimate constitutional rights. In the big man culture that surrounds political office with the trappings of military command. In the casual disregard for institutional process when process becomes inconvenient. In the enduring lesson, not yet fully unlearned, that in Nigeria, force is the final argument.
Fela is gone. He left in 1997, taken by a disease in a body that had been through more than any body should survive. But the Shrine still stands. The music still plays. And somewhere in Lagos tonight, in a room where young Nigerians are listening to the old recordings, there is a saxophone telling a truth that has not yet been made obsolete.
Soldier go, soldier come.
The people remain.
They are still waiting for a government that knows what to do with that.
No comments:
Post a Comment