There was a man called Trump, and when his presidency finally receded into history, the people who wrote about such things turned to him the way one turns to study a storm long after it has passed, sifting through the wreckage to understand what had given it such force.
He had built much of his political life on the question of who belonged and who did not, and nowhere was this more visible than in his approach to immigration, which he pursued with a vehemence that defined him as much as any other single trait.
Early in his first term he signed an order barring entry from several majority-Muslim nations, a policy his critics called a Muslim ban by another name, pointing to his own campaign words as proof of what he truly meant. His defenders called it vetting, sovereignty, the right of a nation to choose who crosses its borders.
The order would later expand to include a number of African nations as well, and that expansion deepened the suspicion among his opponents that something more than security was at work, even as his allies maintained it was simply policy applied consistently.
There was the day, too, that would not be forgotten, when he was said to have described certain countries in language so crude it embarrassed even some who had defended him before.
To his critics this was the unmasking, the moment the curtain fell away and revealed what they had argued all along, that beneath the policy lay a hierarchy of nations and peoples he considered worthy and unworthy. To his supporters, it was an unfortunate remark, blunt and unfiltered, but not proof of anything beyond a man who spoke without polish.
Beneath all of this, the machinery of his administration ground on. Refugee admissions fell to numbers not seen in generations. Protections were stripped from hundreds of thousands of people already living within the country's borders, many of them from Haiti and from nations across Africa, who had built lives there under the promise of temporary shelter that was no longer temporary.
A new immigration system was proposed, one weighted toward skill and education rather than family, which his administration called modernization and his critics called a quiet redrawing of who America wanted and who it did not.
When at last his presidency ended, he left behind two nations living inside one country. To some, he had simply said aloud what others were too cowardly to say, and for that they would defend him long after he was gone.
To others, he had given shape and voice to something they believed their country had begun to outgrow, and his presidency would remain, for them, the proof that it never truly had. History did not resolve this argument. It only handed each side more material with which to continue it.
No comments:
Post a Comment